Roth IRA conversions gain traction as Gen X ages. Should you convert?
Medora LeeRoth conversions to secure tax-free withdrawals during retirement are gaining popularity as Gen X gets closer to retirement, but financial advisers warn that the decision to convert should be carefully considered.
Roth conversions are asset transfers from a pre-tax retirement account such as a traditional IRA or 401(k) into a Roth IRA. People pay income tax on the converted amount in the year of the transfer, but the money grows tax-free and withdrawals during retirement are tax-free. Roth accounts also aren’t subject during retirement to required minimum distributions and aren’t taxable to heirs.
Since income taxes can be a retiree’s largest expense, according to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, it’s natural for people who have the bulk of their retirement savings in traditional 401(k) and IRA accounts to consider converting to Roth accounts. Roth IRAs didn’t exist until 1997, a decade or more after Gen X (born between 1965 and 1980) started working, making it likely that most Gen X savings are in traditional accounts. Conversions during the second quarter of 2024 rose 46% across all ages from the previous year, according to data from investment firm Fidelity.
But “because of the nuance around each person’s situation, you really need to do a full analysis and get the full picture to determine if a Roth conversion is appropriate,” said Chris Berkel, investment adviser and president of AXIS Financial. “If you have two people with identical situations, except one variable, it could make a conversion sensible for one and not the other.”

Can math determine if you should do a Roth conversion?
Typically, people compare their current and expected future marginal tax rates. “The rule of thumb has been that higher future tax rates make a conversion more desirable, while lower ones make it less so,” investment management firm Vanguard said in a report.
Financial advisers say that’s a good start, but Vanguard says the simple rule misses situations in which a Roth conversion can be beneficial even if your expected future tax rate falls. Instead, Vanguard promotes the “BETR,” or break-even tax rate.
BETR is the future tax rate at which it makes no difference whether you convert or not. It can be calculated using Vanguard’s Roth BETR calculator.
How does BETR work?
A person’s future expected marginal tax rate is compared with BETR to determine whether a Roth conversion would be beneficial. “In a sense, the decision hinges upon a single figure,” Vanguard said.
Here’s how it works, Vanguard said:
- If the future tax rate is at BETR, conversion would not make a difference.
- If it is below BETR, conversion would make the investor worse off.
- If it’s above BETR, conversion is the better option.
Example: A person in the 35% marginal tax bracket with $100,000 in a traditional IRA expects a lower 24% rate in retirement. The IRA is expected to triple to $300,000 over 20 years. Based only on tax rates, the person would skip a conversion on the expectation of paying a lower tax on withdrawals later. Using BETR shows a different story.
Without a conversion, the balance would be $228,000 after paying the 24% tax, or $72,000, at withdrawal.
A Roth conversion would cost $35,000, or 35%, in upfront taxes. Assume the $35,000 would have doubled to $70,000 after taxes had it remained invested. That lost growth would reduce the balance at the end of 20 years to $230,000.
Despite the lower expected future tax rate of 24%, the conversion would have yielded $2,000 more, Vanguard said.
(Vanguard used this equation $300,000 * [1 – BETR] = $230,000 and solved for BETR, which is 23.3%. Since that’s lower than the 24% expected future tax rate, the person should convert.)

Is there more to consider when deciding on Roth conversions?
BETR “is a great rule of thumb as a place to start,” Berkel said, “but it doesn’t get into the weeds of someone’s specific situation.”
People also need to look at “soft” considerations, he said. Those could include how much is saved in taxed (e.g. brokerage or money market accounts), pre-taxed (e.g. 401(k) or IRA) and tax-free (Roth or health savings) accounts. Future sources of income, such as traditional pensions, tax-free military benefits and Social Security should also be considered.
“Then, expenses need to be brought into the equation, like how much is going to be spent in retirement and any legacy goals,” Berkel said. “Most people don’t realize that leaving a large, pre-tax IRA to their children could force them to pay more in taxes as well. Some people might not care about this, but others may want to be conscientious of what their kids pay in taxes.”
By law, most non-spouse IRA beneficiaries must fully distribute the account by Dec. 31 of the 10th year following the original owner's death. If the person who died was already taking required minimum distributions before death, the heir must continue taking annual RMDs and have the account depleted by the 10th year. Distributions are taxed as income.
Inherited Roth account distributions aren’t taxed as long as the account has been open at least five years.
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at [email protected] and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday.